FX89 vs FX114 ERW Pipe Mill Model Comparison
This comparison page helps buyers review the differences between FX89 and FX114 ERW pipe mill model ranges for larger welded pipe projects. Use it to decide which single model page to review before asking XFX for engineering confirmation.
FX89 and FX114 Model Comparison Overview
This comparison page helps buyers review the differences between FX89 and FX114 ERW pipe mill model ranges for larger welded pipe projects. Use it to decide which single model page to review before asking XFX for engineering confirmation.
Published Reference XFX Technical Reference Table
Mobile: swipe the table left or right to see all columns.
| Model | Round tube OD (mm) | Round wall (mm) | Square tube size (mm) | Square wall (mm) | Main motor (kW) | HF welder (kW) | Speed (m/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FX89 | Φ50-127 | 1.2-4.5 | 40×40-100×100 | 1.2-3.5 | 250/132×2 | 400 | 20-70 |
| FX114 | Φ63-152 | 1.5-5.0 | 50×50-120×120 | 1.5-4.0 | 160×2 | 400 | 15-60 |
Source: XFX previously published technical reference data. Main motor values with a slash show alternative published reference configurations; the confirmed proposal and contract control the final configuration.
Application Fit by Model Family
FX89: large structural range
A preliminary direction for structural round pipe and hollow sections within the published reference 127 mm round and 100×100 mm square references.
FX114: larger project envelope
Extends the published reference family toward 152 mm round, 120×120 mm square and heavier walls, requiring a broader project-level review.
Industrial fabrication
Machine frames, structural fabrication and construction products may require different straightness, cutting and downstream inspection plans.
Large hollow sections
Square and rectangular products should be evaluated independently because corner formation, twist control and tooling scope affect the line design.
FX89 vs FX114: Large Pipe Mill Decision Factors
Large welded-pipe projects should not be selected from model names or maximum diameter alone. Forming load, wall thickness, material strength, welding power, cutting method, foundations and material handling all influence the final line.
FX89 published reference reference
- Round: Φ50-127 mm, 1.2-4.5 mm wall
- Square: 40×40-100×100 mm, 1.2-3.5 mm wall
- Relevant when the confirmed products remain inside this envelope
FX114 published reference reference
- Round: Φ63-152 mm, 1.5-5.0 mm wall
- Square: 50×50-120×120 mm, 1.5-4.0 mm wall
- Extends the reference range toward larger structural products
Infrastructure checks
- Coil and strip dimensions
- Power supply and workshop foundations
- Material handling and run-out length
- Welding, cutting and inspection requirements
Large-Pipe Project Decisions from FX89 to FX114
- Raw-material definition: Confirm coil width, thickness, grade and weight before entry and lifting equipment are discussed.
- Workshop engineering: Foundation, crane coverage, maintenance space and product-flow direction should be coordinated early.
- Heavy forming: The roll sequence, stand arrangement and drive concept must match the most demanding confirmed products.
- Weld-zone control: Welding, squeeze-roll, scarfing and cooling requirements depend on the material and wall distribution.
- Final geometry: Sizing and hollow-section forming should address dimensional stability, straightness and twist.
- Heavy-product discharge: Cutting, run-out, inspection and packing must support the finished product mass and length.
Infrastructure Differences: FX89 versus FX114
FX89 project emphasis
- Large structural product program
- 100×100 mm-class hollow-section planning
- Heavy but comparatively focused handling
- Dedicated roll-change and inspection areas
FX114 project emphasis
- Larger and thicker published reference product boundary
- Higher lifting and downstream demands
- More extensive foundation and utility review
- Project-level installation coordination
Pre-Quotation Infrastructure Review
Workshop evidence
Provide a dimensioned layout, crane capacity and access route for coil, equipment and finished pipe.
Product matrix
List every important diameter or section with wall, grade, length and expected production share.
Commissioning scope
Confirm local labor, installation assistance, operator training and post-startup support requirements.
Model Comparison FAQ
Is FX114 simply a faster version of FX89?
No. The published reference references describe a larger product boundary, not a speed upgrade. Product mass, forming load, infrastructure and downstream handling all need separate review.
Which model is better for 100×100 mm square tube?
Both published reference tables should be reviewed against the required wall and production mix. FX89 lists 100×100 mm as its published reference upper square reference, while FX114 provides more expansion room; final suitability is not guaranteed by size alone.
What factory information is required for a large pipe mill?
Provide workshop dimensions, foundations, crane coverage, voltage, cooling conditions, material route, finished-pipe route and installation requirements.
Are the published reference speed values guaranteed?
No. They are recovered reference values. Actual operating performance depends on material, size, wall, tooling, welding, cutting and the final technical agreement.
Related Models and Planning Resources
FX89 Tube Mill
Review the large structural model profile.
FX114 Tube Mill
Review the larger project-envelope model profile.
Projects
See how XFX organizes project requirements and support stages.
Request Your Tube Mill Solution
Send your tube size list, wall thickness, material, capacity target, destination country, and factory voltage. XFX will review your requirements before recommending a practical machine configuration.